Scholastic Orthopaedics
(ISSN: 3108-1606)
Sedentary Behavior and Recreational Sports Participation as Determinants of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Bahraini Adult Women: A Mixed-Methods Epidemiological Study to Inform Preventive Health Policy
Dr. Anastasia Athanasiou, PhD
Orthopedic Surgeon Consultant, Evexia Day Surgery Hospital, Bahrain
Corresponding Author: Dr. Anastasia Athanasiou, PhD, Orthopedic surgeon consultant, Evexia Day Surgery Hospital, Bahrain.
Received: March 10, 2026;; Published: March 26, 2026
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a significant public health concern, particularly among women, contributing to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Behavioral, occupational, environmental, and sociocultural factors, including prolonged sedentary behavior and limited recreational sports participation, influence MSD risk. Evidence among Bahraini women remains limited. This study examined behavioral determinants of MSDs among adult Bahraini women, focusing on sedentary behavior and recreational sports participation, and explored sociocultural and environmental contexts affecting physical activity. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. The quantitative phase surveyed 400 Bahraini women aged 25–60 years to assess MSD prevalence, sedentary behavior, and physical activity using validated instruments. Logistic regression identified predictors of MSDs. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected participants to explore barriers, facilitators, and lived experiences. Findings from both phases were integrated to provide a holistic understanding of MSD determinants. MSDs were reported by 44% of participants, most commonly affecting the lower back, neck, and knees. Prolonged sitting (>6 hours/day) and low physical activity were significant predictors (OR 2.3 and ~4.0, respectively). Qualitative insights revealed that cultural expectations, family responsibilities, occupational demands, limited women-only facilities, and environmental constraints further reinforced high-risk behaviors. Integration highlighted a complex interplay of behavioral, occupational, environmental, and sociocultural factors influencing MSD risk. MSDs among Bahraini women are highly prevalent and shaped by multidimensional determinants. Effective interventions should combine individual-level strategies, such as exercise promotion and ergonomic adjustments, with structural and culturally sensitive approaches, including improved access to safe physical activity facilities and workplace ergonomics. These findings provide actionable evidence for policymakers and healthcare providers to reduce MSD risk and improve women’s musculoskeletal health.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal disorders; sedentary behavior; physical activity; women’s health; Bahrain; mixed-methods, Bahraini women, sports participation in Bahraini women
References
- Abdelhay O, Altamimi M, et al; (2025). “Perceived barriers to physical activity and their predictors among adults in the Central Region in Saudi Arabia: Gender differences and cultural aspects”. Plos One, 20(2), e0318798.
- Afsharian A, Dollard M. F, et al; (2023). “Work-related psychosocial and physical paths to future musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)”. Safety Science, 164, pp106177.
- Al-Ajlouni Y. A, Al Ta’ani O, et al; (2023). “The burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a longitudinal analysis from the global burden of disease dataset 1990—2019”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24(1), pp439.
- Alhashim A. A, Alyousof A. A, et al; (2025). “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and their impact on quality of life: A comprehensive review”. Saudi J Med Pharm Sci, 11(5), pp360–377.
- Alseminy M. A. M. M, Chandrasekaran B, & Bairapareddy K. C. et al; (2022). “Association of physical activity and quality of life with work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the UAE young adults”. Healthcare, 10(4) pp625.
- Awadalla A. M, Alsharifa A. A. G, et al; (2024). “Management of musculoskeletal disorders; a systematic review”. J. Med. Dev. Ctries, 8(1), pp340.
- Baldania S, & Baladaniya M. et al:(2024). “Improved Movement, Improved Life: The Vital Contribution of Physical Therapy to Orthopaedic Resilience”. International Journal of Physiotherapy (IJPH), 2(1), pp1–18.
- Bondarev D, Sipilä S, et al; (2021). “Associations of physical performance and physical activity with mental well-being in middle-aged women”. BMC Public Health, 21(1), pp1448.
- Britton L. E, Kaur G, et al; (2023). “We tend to prioritise others and forget ourselves’: How women’s caregiving responsibilities can facilitate or impede diabetes self‐management”. Diabetic Medicine, 40(3), ppe15030.
- Chaabane S, Chaabna K, et al; (2021). “Barriers and facilitators associated with physical activity in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic overview”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), pp1647.
- Chunn L. M, Bissonnette J, et al; (2022). “Estimation of ENPP1 deficiency genetic prevalence using a comprehensive literature review and population databases”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 17(1), pp421.
- Cothran F. A, Paun O, et al; (2022). “Walk a mile in my shoes:’African American caregiver perceptions of caregiving and self-care”. Ethnicity & Health, 27(2) pp435–452.
- Fu R, & Kim S. J. et al: (2021). “Inferring causality from observational studies: the role of instrumental variable analysis”. Kidney International, 99(6), pp1303–1308.
- Hilmi A. H, & Hamid A. R. et al; (2023). “Musculoskeletal Disorders: Industrial Insights and Ergonomic Interventions”. Malaysian Journal of Ergonomics (MJEr), 5, pp61–78.
- Islam R, Mostofa T. B, & E-Elahi Q. M. (2024). “Human Factors & Ergonomics in Healthcare: Targeting MSDs Prevention for Safer.” Efficient Care.
- Masood M. A, Khaled R, et al; (2024). “Occupational health in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): A systematic review and call for comprehensive policy development”. Plos One, 19(12), ppe0312251.
- Meng Y, Xue Y et al; (2025). “The associations between sedentary behavior and neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. BMC Public Health, 25(1), ppp453.
- Naguib R, & Barbar J. et al; (2025). “Factors Shaping Sustainability Through Female Entrepreneurship in the GCC: A Systematic Review with Multi-Level and Institutional Perspective”. Sustainability, 17(5), pp2163.
- Nasaif H, Alaradi M, et al; (2023). “Prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Bahrain”. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(1), pp192–198.
- Nieste I, Franssen W. M. A, et al; (2021). “Lifestyle interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different strategies and effects on cardiometabolic health”. Preventive Medicine, 148, pp106593.
- Núñez-Cortés R, Salazar-Méndez J, & Nijs J. et al: (2025). “Physical Activity as a Central Pillar of Lifestyle Modification in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review”. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 10(2), pp183.
- O’Reilly H, & Van Eerd D. et al: (2025). “Including the ergonomist’s voice in integrating MSD prevention and psychological health and safety: Challenges, tools, and considerations”. Applied Ergonomics, 122, pp104405.
- Osinuga, A. M. et al: (2021). “How Stressful Is Women’s Work? Understanding Rural Nigerian Women’s Domestic Work Experience, Characterizing the Physical Demands, and Estimating Associations with Musculoskeletal Pain”. The University of Iowa.
- Overstreet D. S, Strath L. J, et al; (2023). “A brief overview: sex differences in prevalent chronic musculoskeletal conditions”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), pp4521.
- Pinto A. J, Bergouignan A, et al; (2023). “Physiology of sedentary behavior”. Physiological Reviews.
- Putsa B, Jalayondeja W, et al; (2022). “Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study 2017 to 2020”. BMC Public Health, 22(1), pp1503.
- Shilpy R. A. et al; (2025). “Assessment of workplace ergonomics and its impact on musculoskeletal disorders among office workers in the selected corporate office in Dhaka”. Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University
- Tripathi, A. et al: (2024). “Unraveling the Link Between Prolonged Sitting, Sedentary Lifestyle and Mental Health”. In Indian Journal of Behavioural Sciences (Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 1–6). Medknow.
- Verdú E, Homs J, & Boadas-Vaello P. (2021). “Physiological changes and pathological pain associated with sedentary lifestyle-induced body systems fat accumulation and their modulation by physical exercise”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), pp13333.
- Zhang X, & Li Y. et al; (2025). “Causal effects of sedentary behavior and physical activity on the risk of musculoskeletal disorders: Evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis”. Medicine, 104(38), ppe44390.
Citation: Anastasia Athanasiou. “Sedentary Behavior and Recreational Sports Participation as Determinants of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Bahraini Adult Women: A Mixed-Methods Epidemiological Study to Inform Preventive Health Policy”. Scholastic Orthopaedics 2.3 (2026): 01-13.
Abbas AR Mohamed
Details: Abbas AR Mohamed
Ihor Hospodarsky
Details: Ihor Hospodarsky
NnodimJohnkennedy
Details: NnodimJohnkennedy
Manh Nguyen Huu
Details: Manh Nguyen Huu
Hema
Its good experience to work SCMS journal. All the best for your upcoming isuues.
Sahar Elnour
I had an excellent experience with Scholastic Open Access Journals for the submission and publication of 3 of my articles. Their professionalism and efficiency truly stood out.
The entire process was swift and seamless. After submitting my manuscript, I received detailed feedback from the editorial team within just two weeks. The publication itself was completed in under a month, which exceeded my expectations compared to other journals.
The publication fees were very reasonable, especially for an open-access journal. Scholastic Open Access Journals was upfront about the costs, and there were no hidden charges along the way. For the level of service and exposure, the pricing is more than fair.
The support team was incredibly responsive and helpful. They guided me through the submission process and were always quick to answer my questions. Their communication was clear, timely, and professional throughout.
I was impressed by the high-quality editorial services. The peer review feedback was insightful and constructive, helping me improve my manuscript. The final published article was well-formatted and looked very professional.
Overall, I highly recommend Scholastic Open Access Journals for anyone looking for a quick, affordable, and high-quality open-access publishing experience!