Scholastic Medical Sciences
(ISSN: 3139-7352)
Emotional and financial implications of repeated percutaneous coronary intervention following initial failure in the management of st-elevation myocardial infarction:a kenyan context
Masese Charles1, Antony Gikonyo2, Nyambura Kaniaru3, Premanand Ponoth4, Timothy Wachira5, Dan Gikonyo6, Betty Gikonyo7
1Head of Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery, The Karen Training college
2Chief of Interventional Cardiology.
3Clinical officer
4Chief of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery
5Lecturer Training College, Karen Hospital
6Chief of Cardiology
7The Karen Hospital, Langata Road, Karen 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Masese Charles, Head of Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery (Clinical Cardiology and Cardiac Perfusion). The Karen Hospital Medical Training College, Karen, Nairobi 00200.
Received: July 02, 2026; Published: July 11, 2026
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) requiring urgent intervention to restore coronary blood flow and prevent irreversible
myocardial damage. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is the preferred method of myocardial revascularization and the standard treatment for STEMI. Procedural failure may occur, necessitating repeat
interventions that can result significant emotional and financial burdens on patients and their families. While existing literature has largely focused on clinical outcomes such as procedural success and survival, limited attention has been given to the psychosocial and economic consequences of repeated PCI procedures, particularly in low-resource settings such as Kenya. This study explored the emotional and financial trauma experienced by a patient and his family following repeated PCI procedures after an initial failed intervention. A descriptive sample case study design was employed involving a 73-year-old male patient diagnosed with STEMI at a Kenyan referral hospital. Following failure of the initial PCI, the patient underwent two additional PCI procedures. Data were collected from clinical records, laboratory findings, procedural reports, and narrative accounts from the patient and family members. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes related to emotional experiences, caregiver burden, and financial implications associated with the repeated interventions.
The findings revealed considerable emotional distress affecting both the patient and his family. Following an intra-procedural cardiac arrest during the first PCI attempt, the patient experienced fear, anxiety,
helplessness, and emotional instability. Family members reported persistent worry, sleep disturbances, emotional exhaustion, and uncertainty regarding the patient’s survival and recovery. These experiences highlight the profound psychosocial impact of repeated cardiac interventions beyond the immediate clinical outcome.
The total hospital bill amounted to KES 882,701, leaving an out-of-pocket deficit of approximately KES 300,000 despite partial insurance coverage. To meet these costs, the family organized multiple fundraising
efforts (harambees), depleted personal savings, and experienced income loss due to caregiving responsibilities. The resulting financial strain affected household stability and overall family well-being. Psychological distress associated with repeated invasive procedures was compounded by substantial economic hardship, creating a cyclical burden that negatively influenced patient recovery and family welfare
Key Words: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), Emotional Trauma, Financial Toxicity, Caregiver Burden
References
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2023). Patient Safety Fact Sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2023). Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) Fact Sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al (2018). 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 39(2):119–177.
- Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al (2019). 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 40(2):87–165.
- Moser DK, Kimble LP, Alberts MJ, Alonzo A, Croft JB, Dracup K, et al (2020). Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke. Circulation. 126(9):1080–1093.
- Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, Carney RM, Doering LV, Frasure-Smith N, et al (2014). Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 129(12):1350–1369.
- Zafar SY, Abernethy AP (2013). Financial toxicity, Part I: A new name for a growing problem. Oncology. 27(2):80–149.
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2022). Global Monitoring Report on Financial Protection in Health. Geneva: WHO.
- Ministry of Health Kenya (2023). Kenya National Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases 2023–2027. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
Citation: Dr. Masese Charles., et al. “Emotional and financial implications of repeated percutaneous coronary intervention following initial failure in the 2 management of st-elevation myocardial infarction:a kenyan context”. Scholastic Medical Sciences 3.8 (2026): 01-06.
Abbas AR Mohamed
Details: Abbas AR Mohamed
Ihor Hospodarsky
Details: Ihor Hospodarsky
NnodimJohnkennedy
Details: NnodimJohnkennedy
Manh Nguyen Huu
Details: Manh Nguyen Huu
Hema
Its good experience to work SCMS journal. All the best for your upcoming isuues.
Sahar Elnour
I had an excellent experience with Scholastic Open Access Journals for the submission and publication of 3 of my articles. Their professionalism and efficiency truly stood out.
The entire process was swift and seamless. After submitting my manuscript, I received detailed feedback from the editorial team within just two weeks. The publication itself was completed in under a month, which exceeded my expectations compared to other journals.
The publication fees were very reasonable, especially for an open-access journal. Scholastic Open Access Journals was upfront about the costs, and there were no hidden charges along the way. For the level of service and exposure, the pricing is more than fair.
The support team was incredibly responsive and helpful. They guided me through the submission process and were always quick to answer my questions. Their communication was clear, timely, and professional throughout.
I was impressed by the high-quality editorial services. The peer review feedback was insightful and constructive, helping me improve my manuscript. The final published article was well-formatted and looked very professional.
Overall, I highly recommend Scholastic Open Access Journals for anyone looking for a quick, affordable, and high-quality open-access publishing experience!